#Britishhistory,Europeanhistory

I am reading David Nicholas, The Northern Lands – Germanic Europe, c. 1270-c. 1500 (2009). He writes about England, the Low Countries, Germany and Scandinavia.

England – in Nicholas’ view because it is smaller – gets an effective central state administration early. Apart from the capital, none of its towns is of economic importance. A single institution – Parliament – evolves early as a means for the nobles to manifest themselves relative to the Crown. Government is a negotiation between institutions at the same geographical level.

In the other realms – except Denmark at times – central government is weaker. In Flanders and the Baltic (the Hanse – which is how I got into this topic) towns are powerful. In the Empire, princes of medium and small territories are more powerful than the King. Government is a negotiation between small and big places that are not less or more important because of their size.

Do we Brits experience the EU differently because of this?

Published by

Paul Hodson

Head of Unit "EnergyEfficiency" at European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.